How does the organizational structure of the passage support the author’s purpose?

Wouldn’t it be great to have a burrito bar in the cafeteria? A lot of junior high students love making their own burritos. If we had a burrito bar, students could prepare delicious lunches just the way they like them. The best part is that burritos can be made with wholesome ingredients like beef, chicken, and beans, so there’s no need to worry that the meals would be unhealthy for kids. The ingredients used in school lunches, so there would be no extra expenses for the school.

A. To persuade the reader that burritos are a healthy lunch option, the author uses a compare and contrast structure that shows the benefits of eating burritos.
B. To persuade the reader that the cafeteria should add a burrito bar, the author uses a proposition and support structure that explains the advantages a burrito bar would bring.
C. To inform the reader about the food preferences of junior high students, the author uses a proposition and support structure that suggests having a burrito bar would bring.

B. To persuade the reader that the cafeteria should add a burrito bar, the author uses a proposition and support structure that explains the advantages a burrito bar would bring.

Explanation:

The reasons behind this answer are: first of all, the author wants to persuade the reader to accept and support the idea of having a burrito bar. So, c is incorrect but the structure of the answer confirms it as it has grammar errors. Second, the author doesn't use contrast to fundament its opinion. Furthermore, it provides evidence of the benefits the burrito bar would have in the context. So, b is the correct option because that is the one providing arguments that support an idea, instead of contrast. Third, there is no contrasting elements in the text because the writer doesn't explain what are the cons of having a burrito bar.