Question

Write an argumentative essay for or against using public money to maintain national landmarks, such as the gateway Arch in St. Louis. must use 100 words or more. someone plz help ​

Answer 1

Answer:

As travelers fly into the spirit of the saint louis airport, there are greeted by the huge gleaming Gateway Arch facing the west. National landmarks are areas of great beauty giving opportunity for open-air, established so that national beauty can be preserved and enhanced. National landmarks have such positive influences on peoples lives so i think using public money to maintain national landmarks is good. Public money should be spent on keeping up national parks. because they are part of our country's history and something to admire. i think the money should be spent because if we didn't use the the National landmarks will crumble and fall.

Explanation:

it is not 100 words but i hope it helps

Answer 2

An argumentative essay against using public money to maintain national landmarks, such as the Gateway Arch in St. Louis goes thus:

• Public funds can be used to do some other important thing in society. For example, public funds can be used in providing more infrastructures such as hospitals, schools, etc.

• Rather than using public money to maintain national landmarks, the government can use public funds for between things. Building more hospitals will help in improving the lives of the people.

• Also, the construction of more schools will help in boosting the development of education.

In conclusion, I am against using public money to maintain national landmarks.

Read related link on:

https://brainly.com/question/17187783