Question

in which of the following situations would alternative dispute resolution NOT be a viable alternative ?
A. To save time
B. to set a legal precedent
C. to keep legal proceedings private
D. to save money

Answer 1

Answer: It it not A or C

Explanation:

I tried both, and they were both wrong. I would guess D.

Answer 2

The Correct option is B. To set a legal precedent, alternative dispute resolution would NOT be a viable alternative.

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)

This mechanism was developed in 1980s, bacause of rise in the number of Corporate cases. It was thought that it will save Time of the court and parties, save money as the hearing of matter needs manpower, and will make the dispute private affair.

Although the effectiveness of ADR is still debatable, but as far as the question is concerned, The ADR would not be a viable alternative to set a legal precedent.

Learn More about alternative dispute resolution here:

https://brainly.com/question/8103604