When considering whether or not to be nice to a classmate, Christina says, "If I am nice to Kelly, she might reply the next time I take a snap and send it to her." This type of logic best exemplifies thinking at Kohlberg’s second stage of moral reasoning.
Moral reasoning applies important analysis to specific events to determine what's proper or incorrect, and what people should do in a particular situation. Both philosophers and psychologists take a look at moral reasoning.
Conclusion: As an instance, one may want to argue that it's miles ok to kill one individual if it'd keep five because more human beings would be stored, but killing itself is immoral. Moral judgments and decisions are regularly driven by using automatic, affective responses, in place of explicit reasoning.
Learn more about Moral reasoning here: https://brainly.com/question/24727483
#SPJ2
