A physics student hurries through their lab, releasing the bob of a simple pendulum from a height, and allowing it to swing. He measures the period of the pendulum and calculates that g = 8 m/s2. What might the student have done wrong? Select all that apply. The length of the pendulum string was too long, so the equation for the period of a pendulum was no longer valid in this case. The string wasn't taut when he released the bob, causing the bob to move erratically. The student only timed one cycle, introducing a significant timing error. The angle of release was too large, so the equation for the period of a pendulum was no longer valid in this case. The mass of the bob was too large, so the equation for the period of a pendulum was no longer valid in this case. Instead of releasing the bob from rest, the student threw the bob downward.

Therefore, it is possible to measure the value of [tex]g[/tex] in an experiment, by taking a pendulum, measuring its length L, and measuring its period of oscillation T. Re-arranging the equation above, we get the value of g as:

[tex]g=(\frac{2\pi}{T})^2 L[/tex]

Here the value of g measured in the experiment is [tex]8 m/s^2[/tex] instead of [tex]9.8 m/s^2[/tex]. Let's now analyze the different options:

The length of the pendulum string was too long, so the equation for the period of a pendulum was no longer valid in this case. --> FALSE. There is no constraint on the length of the pendulum.

The string wasn't taut when he released the bob, causing the bob to move erratically. --> TRUE. This is possible, as if the string is not taut, the pendulum would not start immediately its oscillation, so the period would be larger causing a smaller value measured for g.

The student only timed one cycle, introducing a significant timing error. --> TRUE. This is also impossible: in fact, we can get a more accurate measurement of the period if we measure several oscillations (let's say 10), and then we divide the total time by 10.

The angle of release was too large, so the equation for the period of a pendulum was no longer valid in this case. --> TRUE. The formula written above for the period of the pendulum is valid only for small angles.

The mass of the bob was too large, so the equation for the period of a pendulum was no longer valid in this case. --> FALSE. The equation that gives the period of the pendulum does not depend on the mass.

Instead of releasing the bob from rest, the student threw the bob downward. --> FALSE. In fact, this force would have been applied only at the very first moment, but then later the only force acting on the pendulum is the force of gravity, so the formula of the period would still be valid.

waterpigcow waterpigcow · Answer 2 · 2021-06-17T19:11:44+02:00

Answer:

The angle of release was too large, so the equation for the period of a pendulum was no longer valid in this case.

The string wasn't taut when he released the bob, causing the bob to move erratically.

The student only timed one cycle, introducing a significant timing error.

Instead of releasing the bob from rest, the student threw the bob downward.

Explanation:

The angle of release was too large, so the equation for the period of a pendulum was no longer valid in this case. your equation only works for angles > 20 degrees

The string wasn't taut when he released the bob, causing the bob to move erratically. this could lead to errors in either direction

The student only timed one cycle, introducing a significant timing error. unforseen events like wind could heavily influence one cycle.

Instead of releasing the bob from rest, the student threw the bob downward. this would artificially decrease your period (T) and therefor throw the other variables in your equation off. since L is a constant g would be forced to change.