Allan Bakke was responsible for initially questioning the effectiveness of affirmative action. Hence, option B is correct.
What is the scenario of the Allan Bakke?
Affirmative action's legitimacy was contested in the case of Allan Bakke v. the Regents of the University of California. The Bakke case ruling concluded that although affirmative action is permissible, racial quotas are invalid. Bakke argued in court that because he is white, he was unfairly denied admission to the University of California medical school.
As a strategy to address socioeconomic disparity, affirmative action has both clear benefits and drawbacks. The benefits of this strategy are found in the fact that it supports the expansion of job and educational opportunities for certain marginalized groups, such as women in society.
Thus, option B is correct.
For more details about scenario of the Allan Bakke, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1037986
#SPJ6
