Respuesta :
Answer:
"A" option is correct
Explanation:
In this case, the other party didn't agreed to the exchange of any commodity. Its one sided, which is not enforceable by law. Also for these 10,000 Joanne is exchanging nothing.
It would be enforceable if Lila wanted to give 10,000 to Joanne in exchange of some commodity or product. With out exchange from other party its not enforceable.
Answer:
A) un-enforceable because there is not bargained-for exchange.
Explanation:
One of the requisites for constituting a contract is that all the parties involved (in this case Lila and Joanne) must engage in a bargained-for exchange. This means that each party must make a promise or performance in exchange for some performance provided by the other party. In this case, only Lila provided a promise but Joanne didn't provide any.
This can be considered an offer but since Lila cancelled the offer before Joanne accepted it, there is nothing to be enforced.