The plaintiff sued a local restaurant, claiming that she injured her teeth, gums, and mouth when she bit into a hamburger that contained a large, jagged piece of glass. The plaintiff called to the stand a waiter for the restaurant, who testified that, when he heard the plaintiff scream, he looked in her direction and saw her remove a piece of glass from her bleeding mouth. On cross-examination, the defense asked the waiter, "Isn’t it a fact that three months ago you were fired by the restaurant for serving drinks to your friends and not charging for them?" The waiter responded, "Yes, but I wasn’t trying to steal anything. I just forgot to charge them." The defense then asked, "Isn’t it a fact that last month you threw a rock through the plate glass window at the restaurant?" The waiter replied, "That’s not true; I was there but I didn’t throw the rock." The defense then offered the testimony of a witness who was prepared to testify that she saw the waiter throw the rock through the restaurant’s window.

Respuesta :

Answer:

It will be admissible as the testimony will be used to impeach the witness for being biased against the restaurant.

Explanation:

The US legal system allows for witness impeachment where bias can be the cause for concern. As this cross examination of the waiter by the defense laid the foundation to accuse him of bias, the court would allow this new testimony as evidence of bias.

RELAXING NOICE
Relax