Answer:
When A student plans on interviewing 15 principals in neighboring high schools. The student plans to collect data about the personal experiences the principals have had with disruptive students, including the types of disciplinary actions that were taken (including decisions they may have personally made) and their feelings or thoughts regarding whether those actions were appropriate. The research data collected could have an impact on the principals’ careers. The student will collect identifiers. This study would be subject to
Expedited review
Explanation:
Expedited review is the concept to identify the type of review in which the chair and another member of the board participate. It is not a short process because it requires complete analysis and it is specially used when there is already a warning that the study might not have all the elements considered in the criteria. It is a very good tool to fix a proposal to make it reach acceptance. The reason behind this is the effects of the process on the principals' careers and the bias that might happen because of the participants.
This type of study would be done using a full board review.
A full board review is the type of research which involves persons under the protection population. e.g is children, prisoners, pregnant women etc. Since this research is about the experiences of principals with disruptive students, it will be best suited with a full board review.
In Full board Review, The protocols to be reviewed does not fit in the exempt or expedited review category. The full board review presents a more than minimal risk to the subject. The full board will also determine if the risk is actually minimal and if so, future review will use the expedited review category instead.
Hence, the best review for this research will be full board review.
Read more on the different review here https://brainly.com/question/8751857
