A survey conducted recently in the city indicated that most college welfare-aid applicants understate the number of luxury items - such as cars and TVs – that their family owned, in an effort to maximize the amount of aid they can claim from the city. Paradoxically, the same study also found that many applicants claimed that they had running water and a gas connection even when they did not.Which of the following best explains the apparent paradox?A. The city does not pay welfare unless the applicants have at least some things working for them.B .Claiming that they do not have a car or a TV ensures that the city looks at the applicant more favorably.C .While the applicants may be willing to accept that they don't have certain things, they felt embarrassed having to accept that they don't have most things.D .Historically, at least 30℅ of the claims have had people understating what they have while only 22℅ overstated what they had.E .The people who understated what they had were not the same people who overstated what they had.

C .While the applicants may be willing to accept that they don't have certain things, they felt embarrassed having to accept that they don't have most things.

Explanation:

The statement points out an inconsistency in the actions of applicants for college welfare assistance. Although they underestimate the degree for which they have certain items, they often tend to exaggerate the degree to which they have certain items in order to increase the loan.

The answer illustrates why they would overestimate such things like running water-they were too afraid to believe they didn't have basic requirements. They underplayed other issues, however, for maximizing support.

swatiupadhyay714 swatiupadhyay714 · Answer 2 · 2022-01-03T10:53:48+01:00

The best apparent paradox that explains the context is the applicants may be willing to accept that they don't have certain things, they felt embarrassed having to accept that they don't have most things.

The argument highlights a discrepancy in college welfare-aid applicants' behavior. They appear to overstate the extent to which they have some items while understating the extent to which they have others in order to maximize the loan.

In order to explain the discrepancy, the correct answer option must explain why they chose to exaggerate certain points.

The reason they understate certain items is explained in the argument – to increase the loan amount. The correct option must respond to this question.

Therefore, the correct option is C.

To know more about the apparent paradox, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/3949698