Respuesta :
Answer:
The 98% confidence interval for the true difference between testing averages for students using Method 1 and students using Method 2 is (-10.2227, -4.7773)
Step-by-step explanation:
Let [tex]\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}[/tex] be the true difference between testing averages for students using Method 1 and students using Method 2. We have the large sample sizes [tex]n_{1} = 181[/tex] students using Method 1 and [tex]n_{2} = 227[/tex] students using Method 2, the unbiased point estimate for [tex]\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}[/tex] is [tex]\bar{x}_{1} - \bar{x}_{2}[/tex], i.e., 57.5 - 65 = -7.5
The standard error is given by [tex]\sqrt{\frac{\sigma^{2}_{1}}{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma^{2}_{2}}{n_{2}}}[/tex], i.e., [tex]\sqrt{\frac{(14.26)^{2}}{181}+\frac{(7.48)^{2}}{227}}[/tex] = 1.1704.
Then, the endpoints for a 98% confidence interval for [tex]\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}[/tex] is given by
-7.5-[tex](z_{0.02/2})[/tex]1.1704 and -7.5+[tex](z_{0.02/2})[/tex]1.1704, i.e.,
-7.5-[tex](z_{0.01})[/tex]1.1704 and -7.5+[tex](z_{0.01})[/tex]1.1704 where [tex]z_{0.01}[/tex] is the 1st quantile of the standard normal distribution, i.e., -2.3263, so, we have
-7.5-(2.3263)(1.1704) and -7.5+(2.3263)(1.1704), i.e.,
-10.2227 and -4.7773
Answer:
98% confidence interval using Method 1 is (55.01, 59.99) and Method 2 is (63.84, 66.16)
Step-by-step explanation:
Confidence Interval (CI) = mean + or - (t×sd)/√n
Method 1
Mean = 57.5, sd = 14.26, n = 181, degree of freedom = n - 1 = 181 - 1 = 180
t-value corresponding to 180 degrees of freedom and 98% confidence level is 2.3474
Lower bound = 57.5 - (2.3474 × 14.26)/√181 = 57.5 - 2.49 = 55.01
Upper bound = 57.5 + (2.3474 × 14.26)/√181 = 57.5 + 2.49 = 59.99
98% confidence interval using Method 1 is (55.01, 59.99)
Method 2
Mean = 65, sd = 7.48, n = 227, degree of freedom = n - 1 = 227 - 1 = 226
t-value corresponding to 226 degrees of freedom and 98% confidence level is 2.3434
Lower bound = 65 - (2.3434 × 7.48)/√227 = 65 - 1.16 = 63.84
Upper bound = 65 - (2.3434 × 7.48)/√227 = 65 - 1.16 = 6384
98% confidence interval using Method 2 is (63.84, 66.16)