Which of the following would be a valid impossibility defense? A) What the defendant plans to do to the victim is not a criminal act. B) The bank closes before the defendant can rob it. C) The victim does not show up at the ambush point. D) The poison is not strong enough to kill the victim.

Question

18-12-2019
Social Studies

contestada

Which of the following would be a valid impossibility defense? A) What the defendant plans to do to the victim is not a criminal act. B) The bank closes before the defendant can rob it. C) The victim does not show up at the ambush point. D) The poison is not strong enough to kill the victim.

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Write a paragraph, including a topic sentence and supporting details, to provide a response to the following: The story of Kinoos involves many episodes of flee

which of the following is a pure substance

Find the gcf of 20and32

Maxwell has $10,000 in the bank, a $250,000 home, and investments worth $8,000. He also has $8,000 worth of credit card debt and a $175,000 home loan. Maxwell w

Which of the following summarizes the Great Compromise?A. It did not include any of Randolph's suggestions in the New Jersey PlanB. It combined key elements fro

What are the common multiples of 2 3 and 5

Why did Great Britain enact the Proclamation of 1763

is f(x)=-4x squared -2x-8, concave up or down

How does the scarcity of natural resources affect supply and the economy?

ACCESS MORE EDU ACCESS Universidad de Mexico

ogorwyne ogorwyne · Answer 1 · 2022-04-05T09:43:04+02:00

The valid impossibility defense here would be: What the defendant plans to do to the victim is not a criminal act.

What is a valid impossibility defense?

This is an act in the legal terms that talks about actions that are impossible to commit legally.

It is a defense that is said for a person that is on trial for a criminal action. The action of the defendant on the victim can not be said to be illegal.

Read more on the impossibility act here: https://brainly.com/question/7306383