Answer:
See explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Since [tex]\overline{CB}[/tex] is parallel to [tex]\overline {ED},[/tex] then
- angles EDF and CBF are congruent as alternate interior angles when parallel lines [tex]\overline{CB}[/tex] is parallel to [tex]\overline {ED}[/tex] intersect by transversal DB;
- angles DEF and BCF are congruent as alternate interior angles when parallel lines [tex]\overline{CB}[/tex] is parallel to [tex]\overline {ED}[/tex] intersect by transversal CE.
Consider triangles CBF and EDF. In these triangles:
- [tex]\angle EDF\cong \angle CBF[/tex] (proven);
- [tex]\angle FED\cong \angle FCB[/tex] (proven);
- [tex]\overline{CB}\cong \overline {ED}[/tex] (given).
Thus, triangles CBF and EDF are congruent by ASA postulate.