Question

would it be best for the Supreme Court to act quickly and decisively to interpret the law in light of new social situations rather than be unduly beholden to the mistakes of the past."

Answer 1

Answer:

No, it would not.

Explanation:

Being unduly beholden to their mistakes of the past is an extremely important trait in deciding upon the law. In reflecting on the Supreme Court's past actions, they are considering whether or not they are doing something rightful now or doing something wrong that they have already done. If they were to not reflect on their past mistakes history would be doomed to repeat itself and the fate of the entire country would basically flop.

Answer 2

I disagree with the given statement. A further explanation is provided below.

• Being overly bound by their faults of something like history seems to be a critical factor in determining the law. When the Supreme Court considers its previous activities, it considers regardless of whether that there's something appropriate currently or doing something improper which have already been performed.
• If individuals don't learn from their errors of judgment, the pattern repeats itself, and indeed the fortunes of the whole community will tumble.

Thus the above response is correct.

Learn more:

https://brainly.com/question/802411