Respuesta :
Answer:
The Bill of Rights was not needed because checks and balances would limit government power.
Explanation:
The ratification of the US Constitution was not easy. America was divided between Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists defended the need to ratify the Constitution and create the Federalist system. The Anti-Federalists were against the ratification of the US Constitution because they believed that this new constitution created a strong central government that had the potential to be tyrannical.
As a way to ratify the Constitution, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists came to a deal and created the Bill of Rights. The Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution needed a Bill of Rights to safeguard individual liberties.