emily4947
contestada

In humans, having unattached earlobes is the result of a dominant gene, and having attached earlobes is a recessive trait. If a woman with attached earlobes has a child with a man who is homozygous for unattached earlobes, which of the following best describes how the child's earlobes would most likely appear?
a. Their child would have attached earlobes.

b. Their child would have attached earlobes if the father passes on the recessive allele.

c. Their child would have unattached earlobes.

d. Their child would have unattached earlobes if the mother is a carrier for the trait.

Respuesta :

Homozygous: this means that the man has two genes for unattached earlobes, so whichever of these gene genes is transmitted  to the child, it will be unattached. Since having unattached earlobes is a result of a dominant gene, one such gene is enough and the child will definitely have an unattached earlobe.

Answer:

Their child would have unattached earlobes.  

Explanation:

Attached earlobes is a recessive trait and only an individual who is homozygous recessive for this gene will have this trait. Thus the chances of people having  unattached earlobes is more than the chances of people having attached earlobes.

Let e denote the gene representing attatched earlobes and E denote unattatched earlobes.  When a woman with attached earlobes have a child with a man who is homozygous for unattached earlobes the cross would be represented as

[tex]ee \times EE[/tex]

F1   generation

eE  Unattached

eE  Unattached  

eE  Unattached        

eE   Unattached

Since e is recessive all the individuals of the F1 generation will have unattached earlobes.  

Thus the child will have unattached earlobes.  

ACCESS MORE