Answer:
The correct answer is D) All the above
Explanation:
If the convincing evidence has been provided in the case it must be admissible once it is relevant to prove some certain facts, in this case to show the corruption driven by the county supervisor Reynolds. What he looks for, when accusing bias, is to gain time and make sure the evidence presented is convincing and admissible in court; for that reason, the evidence must fulfill different parameters such as:
The information must be organized and presented in a very clear manner
The information must be relevant for the case
The information must be cumulative, it is to say, not only one isolated part of the evidence.
The information must talk by itself, it does not have to need any additional explanation.
