Answer:
The critical value approach and the p-value approach gave the same result.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Population mean, μ = 4 hours
Sample mean, [tex]\bar{x}[/tex] = 4.5
Sample size, n = 460
Alpha, α = 0.051
Population standard deviation, σ = 1.00 hour
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
[tex]H_{0}: \mu = 4.00\text{ hours}\\H_A: \mu > 4.00\text{ hours}[/tex]
We use One-tailed z test to perform this hypothesis.
Formula:
[tex]z_{stat} = \displaystyle\frac{\bar{x} - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}} }[/tex]
Putting all the values, we have
[tex]z_{stat} = \displaystyle\frac{4.5 - 4}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{60}} } = 3.87[/tex]
Now, [tex]z_{critical} \text{ at 0.01 level of significance } = 2.326[/tex]
Since,
[tex]z_{stat} > z_{critical}[/tex]
We reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternate hypothesis. Thus, low-income families are exposed to more than 4.0 hours of daily background television.
p value at z-stat 3.87 is 0.000054. Since p-value is less than the significance level. We reject the null hypothesis.
Hence, the critical value approach and the p-value approach gave the same result.