The decision in Miranda v. Arizona was important to criminal procedure because _____. (Select all that apply.)

it provides protections for individuals throughout the whole process
it eliminates actions that get in the way of due process
it limits the behavior of law enforcement officers
it grants civil rights to criminal defendants

Miranda v. Arizona was a significant Supreme Court case that ruled that a defendant's statements to authorities are inadmissible in court unless the defendant has been informed of their right to have an attorney present during questioning and an understanding that anything they say will be held against them.

Answer Link

joshnajd joshnajd · Answer 2 · 2019-10-30T07:41:51+01:00

Answer:

it provides protections for individuals throughout the whole process
it limits the behavior of law enforcement officers

Explanation:

In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court decided that confined criminal suspects, preceding police addressing, must be educated regarding their established right to a lawyer and against self-implication.

That most TV agreeable of Supreme Court cases, Miranda v. Arizona, was chosen in 1966.

Under Chief Justice Earl Warren, the court decided 5 to 4 that the police needed to pursue certain systems to guarantee the insurance of a criminal presume's Fifth Amendment benefit against self-implication.