In order to determine if the case she was hearing broke the law, Judge Jane referred to prior rulings on the same subject. In other words, the judge is relying on precedent to make her decision. True or False

Respuesta :

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Look at the current facts not outher ones not on this case

In order to determine if the case she was hearing broke the law, Judge Jane referred to prior rulings on the same subject. In other words, the judge is relying on precedent to make her decision.

The statement is false.

What's the doctrine of precedent mean?

The doctrine of precedents makes the decisions of courts, generally binding on the Supreme Court in instances wherein comparable or identical queries of law are raised before the court docket. The notable value of the doctrine of precedents is that it offers reality.

The Fourth amendment paperwork is the basis of a “right to privacy,” the right to be left by myself, as Justice Louis Brandeis placed it. The entertainment of economic and personal privateness is fundamental to a loose and civil society.

Learn more about Supreme Court here: https://brainly.com/question/6111641

#SPJ2

ACCESS MORE