Respuesta :
A) m = 4
We can solve the problem by using Rydberg equation:
[tex]\frac{1}{\lambda}=R_H (\frac{1}{n^2}-\frac{1}{m^2})[/tex]
where
[tex]R_H = 1.097\cdot 10^7 m^{-1}[/tex] is the Rydberg constant for hydrogen
n is the principal quantum number of the upper energy level
m is the principal quantum number of the lower energy level
For the first wavelength, we have
[tex]\lambda=97.26 nm = 97.26\cdot 10^{-9} m[/tex]
Substituting into the equation, we find
[tex]\frac{1}{n^2}-\frac{1}{m^2}=\frac{1}{\lambda R_H}=\frac{1}{(97.26\cdot 10^{-9} m)(1.097\cdot 10^7 m^{-1})}=0.9373[/tex])
By setting n=1, we obtain the Lyman series which goes from 121.6 nm (for m=2) to 91.18 nm (for [tex]m=\infty[/tex]). So our line of 97.26 nm must be in this series.
By setting n=1, we find m:
[tex]\frac{1}{m^2}=\frac{1}{n^2}-0.9373=\frac{1}{1^2}-0.9373=0.0627\\m=\frac{1}{\sqrt{0.0627}}=4[/tex]
B) n = 1
n can be found by thinking about the limit of the different series.
Larger n corresponds to larger wavelengths; for each n, m goes from (n+1) to [tex]\infty[/tex], and the shortest wavelength of each series is the one corresponding to [tex]m=\infty[/tex].
If we put n = 2, and [tex]m=\infty[/tex], we find the shortest wavelength of the n=2 series:
[tex]\frac{1}{\lambda}=R_H (\frac{1}{n^2}-\frac{1}{m^2})=(1.097\cdot 10^7 m^{-1})(\frac{1}{2^2}-\frac{1}{\infty})=\frac{1.097\cdot 10^7 m^{-1}}{4}=2.74\cdot 10^6 m^{-1}\\\lambda=\frac{1}{2.74\cdot 10^6 m^{-1}}=3.64\cdot 10^{-7} m = 364 nm[/tex]
which is longer than our line at 97.26 nm, so n must be smaller than 2, which means n=1.
C) m = 5
Similarly to what we did in part A), here we have a wavelength of
[tex]\lambda=1282 nm = 1282\cdot 10^{-9} m[/tex]
Substituting into the Rydberg equation, we find
[tex]\frac{1}{n^2}-\frac{1}{m^2}=\frac{1}{\lambda R_H}=\frac{1}{(1282\cdot 10^{-9} m)(1.097\cdot 10^7 m^{-1})}=0.0711[/tex])
By setting n=3, we obtain the Paschen series which goes from 1875 nm (for m=4) to 820.4 nm (for [tex]m=\infty[/tex]). So our line of 1282 nm must be in this series.
By setting n=3, we find m:
[tex]\frac{1}{m^2}=\frac{1}{n^2}-0.0711=\frac{1}{3^2}-0.0711=0.04001\\m=\frac{1}{\sqrt{0.04001}}=5[/tex]
D) n = 3
Similarly to what we did in part B), if we put n = 4, and [tex]m=\infty[/tex], we find the shortest wavelength of the n=4 series:
[tex]\frac{1}{\lambda}=R_H (\frac{1}{n^2}-\frac{1}{m^2})=(1.097\cdot 10^7 m^{-1})(\frac{1}{4^2}-\frac{1}{\infty})=\frac{1.097\cdot 10^7 m^{-1}}{16}=6.856\cdot 10^5 m^{-1}\\\lambda=\frac{1}{6.856\cdot 10^5 m^{-1}}=1.458\cdot 10^{-6} m = 1458 nm[/tex]
which is longer than our line at 1282 nm, so n must be smaller than 4. Indeed, if we try with n=3, we find:
[tex]\frac{1}{\lambda}=R_H (\frac{1}{n^2}-\frac{1}{m^2})=(1.097\cdot 10^7 m^{-1})(\frac{1}{3^2}-\frac{1}{\infty})=\frac{1.097\cdot 10^7 m^{-1}}{9}=1.219\cdot 10^6 m^{-1}\\\lambda=\frac{1}{1.219\cdot 10^6 m^{-1}}=8.204\cdot 10^{-7} m = 820.4 nm[/tex]
So, our line is contained in the n=3 series.
E) Ultraviolet
We can answer this question by looking at the different wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum. In fact, we have:
Ultraviolet: 380 nm - 1 nm
Visible: 750 nm - 380 nm
Infrared: 1 mm - 750 nm
Our wavelength here is
97.26 nm
So, we see it is included in the ultraviolet part of the spectrum. In fact, all lines in the Lyman series (n=1) lie in the ultraviolet ragion.
F) Infrared
Again, the electromagnetic spectrum is:
Ultraviolet: 380 nm - 1 nm
Visible: 750 nm - 380 nm
Infrared: 1 mm - 750 nm
Our wavelength here is
1282 nm
So, we see it is included in the infrared part of the spectrum. In fact, all lines in the Paschen series (n=3) lie in the infrared band.