Question

PLEASE ANSWER ASAP! Opponents of reusing water have long had the upper hand, said Paul Slovic, a professor of psychology at the University of Oregon, because of the “branding problem.”
People tend to judge risk emotionally, he said, and a phrase like “toilet to tap” can undercut earnest explanations. “The water industry has not been good at marketing reuse,” he added. But research has shown that highlighting the benefits of recycled water—and the need—can shift emotions to a more positive reaction and help diminish the sense of risk.
–“Water Flowing from Toilet to Tap
May Be Hard to Swallow,”
John Schwartz

Which statement is a correct evaluation of the evidence in the passage?
It is sound because it cites an expert’s opinion.
It is not valid because it uses irrelevant information.
It is logical because it includes statistics and other scientific data.
It is illogical because it does not connect the reader back to the claim.

Answer 1

It is sound because it cites an expert’s opinion.

Answer 2

In the passage, the statement that correctly evaluates the evidence is that it cites an opinion of the expert due to the sound that is being depicted.

Option A is the correct answer.

Who is John Schwartz?

John Schwartz is the writer for climate change in the renowned daily newspaper of New York called as New York Times.

The passage evaluates the opinion highlighted by the expert professor of psychology relating to the reuse of water. The water can be recycled and reused by explaining the benefits to the people which can ultimately change their perspective.

Therefore, the statement given in part A would evaluate the evidence highlighted in the passage.

Learn more about John Schwartz in the related link:

https://brainly.com/question/14335685

#SPJ2