PLS HELP I WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLYEST
The Truth About Antibacterial Soap
According to Discovery Fit & Health, about 75 percent of liquid soaps claim to be antibacterial. While this kind of soap sounds like a good idea, it is really not more effective than regular soap. Soap in general works by binding with dirt and grime and bacteria. This binding action allows the particles to be washed away easily. Antibacterial soap really does no more than regular soap. In fact, to be more effective than regular soap, antibacterial soap should stay on your skin for about two minutes to do what it claims it can do. Most people do not wash their hands that long. In addition, antibacterial soap may do harm. First, it kills both beneficial and harmful bacteria. Second, scientists believe bacteria may become resistant to antibacterial agents over time, especially if they are not used correctly. Finally, antibacterial soap does nothing to viruses. Most of the time, we get sick from viruses, not bacteria. In sum, antibacterial soap does not live up to the hype. You are better off just using regular soap.
Which shows how “The Truth About Antibacterial Soap” explains the main problem with antibacterial soap?
A. It argues antibacterial soaps should be banned from the market.
B. It compares the effectiveness of antibacterial soap to regular soap.
C. It explains how soap works in general then lists negative effects.
D. It summarizes the main problem with soaps in the environment.

The text above compares the efficiency of ordinary soap and antibacterial soap. According to the text, antibacterial soap is not as efficient as ordinary soap, as they say. On the contrary, antibacterial soap can cause harm because it can kill beneficial bacteria in your body, not to mention that it does not kill viruses and needs to be passed in the hand for a longer period of time than necessary with normal soap.

According to the comparison made in the text, the efficiency of antibacterial soap is not as good, as stated.