Question

Which is NOT an example of checks and balances between the branches of government? Question 1 options: The governor vetoes a law passed by the legislative branch. The legislative branch votes to impeach a governor for illegal actions. The judicial branch decides that a law is unconstitutional and should be changed. The lieutenant governor assumes the office of governor after the governor becomes to ill to work.

Answer 1

Answer:

The odd option in the given options is The lieutenant governor assumes the office of governor after the governor becomes to ill to work.

Explanation:

The American Constitution divides the Government into three branches which are Legislative, Executive, and Judicial. The system of checks and balances was designed to make sure that none of the branches would be able to control too much power, and it created a separation of powers in the democratic system. This system does not include any information about the assumption of the office of governor after the governor becomes too ill to work.

Answer 2

The American constitution is divided into three branches to preserve the separation of powers: legislative, executive, and judicial.

To know the odd option from the given Options we need to clear the concept of checks and balances.

Why was the system of checks and balance were designed?

The system of checks and balances was devised to ensure that none of the branches have undue authority. It also established a division of powers in the democratic system.

This system has no information on assuming the governorship after the government becomes unable to work.

Thus the Option D is not an example of checks and balances between branches of government.

For more information about Branches of government refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/16710386