The correct answer is D. Precedent
Explanation:
In law, the term judicial restraint refers to a limitation in power judge have when taking decisions in a legal case. According to judicial restraint, principle judges should not go against laws except if they are really unconstitutional and should consider precedents or the decisions taken by other judges in similar cases before taking a final decision. Additionally, this concept is the opposite of the term judicial activism in which judges follow their personal perspectives rather than the law and precedents in court cases. Therefore, Judicial restraint means that a judge will consider precedents when making decisions about a case.
