Question

Considering the historian's use of source material, which interpretation is most valid?

A. A historian uses an unidentified political cartoon published in Japan after World War II in order to draw conclusions about the war's effect on the Japanese economy

B. A historian cites a Japanese newspaper article published a year after the end of World War II in order to draw conclusions about the effect of the war on the Japanese economy

C. A historian cites a 2015 blog post by a Japanese teenager in order to draw conclusions about Japan's economy after World War II

D. A historian uses a book written by Japanese World War II fighter pilot in order to draw conclusions about the war's effect on the Japanese economy

Answer 1

Answer:

B. A historian cites a Japanese newspaper article published a year after the end of World War II in order to draw conclusions about the effect of the war on the Japanese economy

Explanation:

In this case, the historian is actually alluding to a historical source. A Newspaper is also a source of information and it is much more reliable than a random cartoon, a blog post, or an unreliable personal opinion.

From the newspaper, the historian can most likely check opinions from different journalists and the many different things that specialists were saying about the economy of the country back then.

Answer 2

Answer:

A historian cites a Japanese newspaper article published a year after the end of World War II in order to draw conclusions about the effect of the war on the Japanese economy

Explanation:

brainliest plz