Read the following source listing for research on the topic of techniques for
fighting wildfires:
ISBN: 7556292345111 / 0-1010-1389-Y
Title: The Terrorizing Impact of Wildfires
Author: Kirston Miles
Date: 1965
Which is the best evaluation of the source's credibility?
A. The source is unreliable because the firefighting techniques will be
outdated.
B. The source is reliable because knowledge of wildfires is not new.
C. The source is unreliable because it is a book rather than a website.
D. The source is reliable because the source is transparent.

Respuesta :

The answer is A on apex I just finished that question!!!

The best evaluation of the credibility of the source is given in option (A): "the source is unreliable because the firefighting techniques will be outdated."

Why the source is outdated?

The firefighting techniques used in the article would be outdated to fight the current wildfires. Therefore, the source credibility will be outdates and will contain traditional methods of firefighting.

When researchers adopt older methods, they are missing out on new discoveries, which can stymie outcomes. They can limit the likelihood that other researchers will be able to replicate their results by using older gear.

Therefore. option (A) is the best evaluation of the credibility.

Check out the link below to learn more about source credibility;

https://brainly.com/question/16530693

#SPJ2

ACCESS MORE