Question

What difficulties might result if each State were not required to give full faith and credit to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of other States? Provide at least two examples to support your conclusion.

Answer 1

Under Article IV, Section 1 of the United States Constitution, States have to respect all public records, acts, and judicial proceedings.

Thus we can conclude that this is done to ensure that states respect and honor each other state laws and court orders.

Were a State not required to uphold this Article, it would result in:

1. States not enforcing clear actions and orders given by the courts of another state of law.
2. A State indirectly imposing its own legislation on every other state.

Answer 2

Article IV of the US Constitution, states in its "Full Faith and Credit Clause" that every state must pay full respect to the states’ statutes, public records, and court decisions.

It further states that every state must follow the juridical decision of other states and implement them in the same way they were implemented at home.

The difficulties to be faced if "Full Faith and Credit Clause" is not followed:

The clause prevents states from reopening the cases which already have been concluded in other states. This, therefore, leads to juridical efficieny.

There will be uniformity in the decisions of each state.

If states were not required to give full faith and credit to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of other States, the decision-making will be delayed and there will be a lack of uniformity.

Every state will make decisions as per their own law and hence will result in conflicts.

Learn more about the Full Faith and Credit Clause here:

https://brainly.com/question/1345801