Which statement from the article "Free Speech Versus Violent Video Games" best supports Thomas’s belief that the California law does NOT violate a freedom of speech under the U.S. Constitution?

Which statement from the article free speech versus violent video games best supports Thomas's belief that the California law does not violate freedom of speech under u. s. constitution? a) games — which the entertainment software association says are played in 68 percent of American households — are protected forms of expression under the first amendment to the constitution. b) the proposed California video law does not ban parents from purchasing or buying video games for their children. c) the federal trade commission studies suggest that the video game industry’s rating system was not effective in blocking minors from purchasing games designed for adults. d) the video game industry also argues that approval of California's video game restrictions could open the door for states to limit minors’ access to other material on the grounds of protecting children.

The case identified that video games get loose-speech protection. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma, used with permission from The Associated Press.) The U.S. very best courtroom has defined that video games are a shape of expression entitled to first change protection.

Can the government regulate video games?

First, the supreme court identified that video games, even though a new and special form of medium, speak ideas much like a movie, television show, e-book, or music. The country did no longer have laws regulating those kinds of speech love it did with video games, and moreover, the general rule is that you cannot suppress ideas.

Learn more about the supreme court here: https://brainly.com/question/6111641

#SPJ2