Question

How were the Miranda v. Arizona and Gideon v. Wainwright cases similar?

A. Both cases resulted in expanded protections for people accused of crimes.
B. Both cases dealt with creating a balance between civil liberties and the public interest.
C. Both cases resulted in expanded civil liberties for students in public schools.
D. In both cases, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of limiting religious expression in schools.

Answer 1

The correct answer is A. Both cases resulted in expanded protections for people accused of crimes. The cases  questioned the integrity of America's legal system and the decisions from the cases helped to ensure that the rights of the accused would be upheld while ensuring that the accused got a fair shot to prove their innocence.

Answer 2

the answer is A , apex :)))