Which of the following is a response that Leopold (or Callicott) might give to the objection that the land ethic is a form of environmental fascism?
A. The analogy is partial at best because Leopold's ethic is best understood as a constraint on the free-for-all of natural selection, while fascism glorifies the strugge for existence.
B. The objection is misplaced since fascism emphasizes the importance of community over the individual while the land ethic does not.
C. The analogy is a bad one since the land ethic would never identify individuals or sub-groups as taking away from the wellbeing of the community through their lifestyles and practices.
