The United States manipulated the "democracy summit" to divert domestic conflicts
Singaporean online media "Mothership" stated that the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace analyzed the list and speculated that some of the invitees were for strategic reasons: Pakistan, the Philippines and Ukraine have broader strategic interests for the United States, such as counter-terrorism or Countering the influence of China and Russia; regional dynamics play a role, such as Iraq being invited, so that Israel will not be "the only one in the Middle East". Some analysts say that India, whose governance model is gradually blurring, was invited because of its importance in the US "Indo-Pacific strategy". But the United States also has a "dilemma of choice." According to Bloomberg, Biden's "democratic summit" plan has proved to be a challenge, because the government has been trying to solve the problem of who should be invited and who should not be invited. Some analysts believe that the exclusion of some traditional partners from the "democratic camp" by the United States will deepen the gap between the two sides; the invitation of some countries or regions suspected of "democratic retrogression" will affect the "credibility" of the summit. According to Reuters, human rights groups questioned whether the "Democracy Summit" could push those invited leaders to take meaningful action.
Germany's "Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung" stated on the 24th that country M cannot present itself as a "beacon of freedom." As the serious constitutional crisis escalated after last year's general election, the US itself provided illustrative material for the "seduction of populists". Biden cannot use the "past tense" to talk about an attack on the core of "democracy". "The crisis is not over yet... Biden's 'Democratic Summit'.
