One of the main ideas taken up by Cornelius in this chapter (6) is the question:
a. why do we seek to compare theories if they are so different?
b. is there an imperative need to address more than one theory of emotion?
c. is it possible to compare the different perspectives, or are they so different that they have nothing to say to one another?
d. are the different perspectives actually too similar, so as to render any debate about them futile?
