Read "Yi Sun-Kyung's "An Immigrant's Split Personality" Think carefully and answer the following questions and share your findings: 1. Is the title effective? Why/Why not? 2. What tone has the author used? Is this tone appropriate in conveying his message? why do you think so? 3. What has the author mainly used to support her point/s? Is it convincing enough? 4. What else could the author have used to make her argument/s more credible? 5. Is the language clear or complicated? Was the language (formal/semi- formal/informal) appropriate for the author's intended audience? 6. Did the author use any specific language (Irony/Metaphor/ Humor/ Paradox/...) to engage the readers? 7. Did the author present the ideas with a logical flow that made the points easy to follow? 8. Did the author use enough details (examples/ facts/ references/ personal experiences/...) to support her claim/s? 9. Is there a presence of bias or fallacy? How and where? 10. Is the publisher of this article well-known/trusted? 11 Is the article relevant today?
