A driver was pulled over because the driver was observed buying drugs. The officer immediately pulled the driver out of the car, searched the car, and seized the narcotics. If the driver contests that this evidence is inadmissible at trial, what would the likely result be?
a.
The evidence would be admitted because the officers had probable cause to search the car.
b.
The evidence would be admitted because the officers did not need a warrant under the circumstances present here.
c.
The evidence would be admitted because this search was justified under the automobile exception to the Fourth Amendmentâs warrant requirement.
d.
All of the above.
e.
None of the above. The evidence would not be admissible.