Part 5: Assume that Mr. Stark files suit against the San Marcos Lawn & Garden Center, and that the store does not assert any defenses. Mr. Stark will most likely
A. Prevail because the store breached a duty by failing to inspect the shelving for months, and that failure was the cause of Mr. Stark falling and sustaining the reasonably foreseeable injury of a broken leg
B. Prevail because any time a customer is injured at a business open to the public, the business is always liable for those injuries
C. Not prevail because, while it is foreseeable that employees could be injured by reaching for items on high shelves, customers are not in the zone of danger, so the store did not owe Mr. Stark a duty similar to the Palsgraf case
D. Not prevail because, while the store owed Mr. Stark a duty, the severity of the injury he sustained from such a short fall is not reasonably foreseeable, so he cannot prove proximate cause
